Skip to content

Chapter 02 Vol. 15, Autumn 2026

Case notes

Six matters from the last two years. We changed the details that would identify a client and kept the numbers, because the numbers are the point.

Published with each client's written consent. Company descriptions are approximate; outcomes are as recorded in our matter files.

  1. Matter
    25-088
    Year
    2025
    Sector
    Software
    Practice
    Restructuring, Separations

    A first layoff, done once

    Series C logistics software company, 640 people

    The situation. The company had to reduce headcount by a third across nine states, eight weeks after a missed fundraise. It had never run a layoff and its people team was two people.

    What we did. We built the selection file with finance, ran an adverse impact analysis on three drafts, mapped federal and state notice rules for each site, and drafted 212 agreements with the required age disclosures.

    Outcome. 207 of 212 agreements signed in the review period. No charges or claims filed in the twelve months that followed.

    207 / 212agreements signed in the review period

  2. Matter
    24-117
    Year
    2024
    Sector
    Healthcare services
    Practice
    Pay and classification

    The contractor question

    Home-care staffing marketplace, 1,140 caregivers

    The situation. A state labor department opened an audit into whether the marketplace's caregivers were employees. The initial back-wage estimate was $1.9 million.

    What we did. We reviewed the working relationship under the state test, built a phased reclassification plan with payroll, and presented the plan to the agency before its findings were issued.

    Outcome. 388 caregivers moved to W-2 in the first phase. The audit closed with $41,300 in back wages and no penalty.

    $41,300to close an audit that opened at $1.9M

  3. Matter
    25-014
    Year
    2025
    Sector
    Financial technology
    Practice
    Investigations, Separations

    An investigation the board could rely on

    Payments company, 90 people

    The situation. Three employees raised complaints about the chief technology officer within a week. The chief executive was a close friend of the executive concerned.

    What we did. The board engaged us directly. We interviewed 23 people in eleven working days, reviewed 4,800 messages, and reported to the independent directors only.

    Outcome. Findings delivered on day 19. A negotiated departure followed within a month, with no litigation.

    19 daysfrom first call to final report

  4. Matter
    24-062
    Year
    2024
    Sector
    Retail
    Practice
    Handbooks

    Twelve states, one handbook

    Direct-to-consumer furniture brand, 310 people

    The situation. Opening showrooms took the company from three states to twelve in eighteen months. Its handbook had grown to 41 policies, several contradicting each other.

    What we did. We rewrote the handbook around what store and warehouse staff do, added a short addendum per state, and set up a twice-yearly review of leave and pay-transparency rules.

    Outcome. 41 policies became 23. Store managers now answer most leave questions without escalating to people operations.

    41 to 23policies after the rewrite

  5. Matter
    25-140
    Year
    2025
    Sector
    Manufacturing
    Practice
    Hiring and contracts

    Covenants that would hold

    Industrial sensor maker, acquiring a 46-person startup

    The situation. The acquirer wanted non-competes from every employee of the target, including several in states that do not enforce them.

    What we did. We replaced blanket non-competes with narrower non-solicitation terms and paid garden leave for nine key people, and agreed the terms with the target's counsel before signing.

    Outcome. All 46 employees signed before closing. Two later departures were handled through garden leave with no dispute.

    46 of 46acquired employees signed before closing

  6. Matter
    24-009
    Year
    2024
    Sector
    Healthcare services
    Practice
    Disputes

    A charge answered on the facts

    Medical billing company, 1,300 people

    The situation. A former team lead filed a discrimination charge after a performance-based termination, and the company's documentation was thin.

    What we did. We rebuilt the record from contemporaneous emails and scheduling data, then filed a position statement of nine pages with 31 exhibits.

    Outcome. The agency dismissed the charge with a no-cause finding after seven months.

    No causefinding issued after 7 months